Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab 2005;49(4):563-568

Accuracy, effect on insulin therapy and glycemic control and complications of the continuous glucose monitoring system in type 1 diabetic patients

Frederico F.R. , Levimar R.

DOI: 10.1590/S0004-27302005000400015

To evaluate the efficacy, safety and complications of continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in type 1 diabetic patients (DM1), we retrospectively studied 30 patients (25.8 ± 12.2 years) submitted to 72hs CGMS (Medtronic; Northridge, CA) and analyzed: mean self monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) and mean CGMS sensor’s glycemic value; correlation coefficient (%), median absolute percent difference (MAD%), number of sensor reading, glycemic excursions (CGMS vs. SMBG), complications (trauma, local infection, disconnection) and therapeutic management after CGMS. A1c levels were measured 1 month before and 3 months after the study. Mean capillary glucose values were 186.5 ± 43.3mg/dl vs. 179.7 ± 48.1mg/dl by CGMS sensor, with significant correlation (p= 0.001). An average of 772.4 ± 254.1 (VR > 680) glucose measurements was recorded for each patient, with 68.7 ± 19.8hs of exam. Correlation coefficient was 0.86 ± 0.21 (VR > 0.79). Median absolute percent difference between sensor and glucometer values was 13.9 ± 4.7% (VR < 28%). The CGMS was significant more efficient in detection of glycemic excursion related to capillary glycemia (p= 0.009). This data showed important decreased level of A1c in this population 3 months after the CGMS with statistical significance (p= 0.018). No complications were registered in 96.7% of patients. No trauma, local infection or bleeding were registered. The insulin therapeutic regimen was adjusted in 100% of patients. The CGMS showed to be a very safety method, well tolerated, with high accuracy in glycemic values and low complications rate. This method has to be more stimulated by physicians and patients.

Accuracy, effect on insulin therapy and glycemic control and complications of the continuous glucose monitoring system in type 1 diabetic patients

Comments (0)